I have been planning a trip for some time now and have sort of narrowed down to the following sites...
1) Agra (1 Night - Taj Mahal)
2) Delhi (5 Nights - Wedding and Visiting)
3) Amritsar (1 Night - Golden Temple)
4) Mumbai (3 Nights - Visiting the City)
5) Udaipur (1 Night - Lake Palace Hote + City Palace)
Udaipur sort of ranks fifth in my priority list, after the top four destinations... My question is that I might have to cut my trip short by one day, and I want to get feedback and see if I would be right to cut Udaipur (rather than a day in Mumbai or Amritsar)...
I understand that Mumbai is not as touristy but I sort of want to experience what Mumbai is like, as one of the most vibrant Asian cities...
From all the research I have done, UDaipur is indeed a very important place to visit (probably ranked second after Agra in terms of Touristic importance) but the pictures do not really show much.. Am I missing something? If Udaipur's main attraction is the City Palace, is that really worth seeing? (I live in Europe and have seen many ruin and castles across many countries)
The reason I am asking this is that I might be fall one day short so