We're [Mum, Dad and DD20] deciding on where to go on holiday next year, [end of August, beginning of Sept] and two places that really stand out our San Francisco [which we visited for 4 nights this July], and NYC [which we've been to twice].
What I was thinking was fly to SF first, get the longest leg of the trip over. Spend 7 nights -- we're thinking of maybe getting a holiday rental in the Castro area??
Then visit somewhere new, I was either thinking of flying to Chicago spend a few nights, then on to Niagara Falls [staying on the Canadian side], and finally NYC for 7 nights.
I can't remember the amount in $, but it's £100+ to fly to Chicago, then I think another £70 to Buffalo. Whereas it's less than £100 to fly from SF to Buffalo, even though it's furthur in distance. So I was thinking of cutting out Chicago, and going straight to Buffalo. I don't know if it's worth all the extra flight costs to visit Chicago for a few nights? What's the going rate for a flight from SF to Chicago?
Currently with the flights I'm looking at, we'd be in NYC over Labour Day, from the 2nd-9th Sept.
Any thoughts? Opinons?
Merry Christmas to All :D