We noticed that you're using an unsupported browser. The TripAdvisor website may not display properly.We support the following browsers:
Windows: Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome. Mac: Safari.
Save
Review Highlights
Interesting but short on information,

It is fascinating to see these remains of nearly 6,000 years of human habitation. However, when I... read more

Reviewed 4 weeks ago
happytraveller40
,
Exeter UK
Worth a visit

Underrated, and underexposed, but if you're familiar with the ancient history of the land, its a... read more

Reviewed 7 November 2018
JJW18
,
London, United Kingdom
Read all 10 reviews
  
Reviews (10)
Filter reviews
10 results
Traveller rating
3
3
3
0
1
Traveller type
Time of year
LanguageAll languages
3
3
3
0
1
See what travellers are saying:
Filter
Updating list...
8 - 10 of 10 reviews
Reviewed 5 May 2016

This site isn't as large as some of the others in the region - smaller than Tell Megiddo, about the same size as Tell es-Sultan in Jericho. But it's still a fascinating visit. There's a small on-site museum with some amazing finds from the site, ranging from the chalcolithic to Roman eras. The video introduction which is played is also very helpful to get a lot of context for the site - unlike the two other Canaanite sites I mentioned earlier, there's not a lot of explanation on the signs identifying each of the ruins. Something that still needs improving here.

The gate by the entrance we chose wasn't staffed as we entered, so we had to go seek out the staff in their office in the main building. The attendant was very helpful once we made ourselves known.

In terms of preservation and excavation, the most visually obvious and exciting parts were the city wall (comparatively well preserved for the era) and double-chambered gateway, as well as the central temple area. Down the other end of the site there are still olives growing amongst the ruins - very Palestinian!

If you're coming to Nablus, it's well worth a visit for historical significance as an early city-state, although without some of the visual splendour of the old city or Roman ruins.

Date of experience: March 2016
Thank 445patrickh
This review is the subjective opinion of a TripAdvisor member and not of TripAdvisor LLC
Reviewed 16 December 2017 via mobile
Google Translation

Date of experience: December 2017
This review is the subjective opinion of a TripAdvisor member and not of TripAdvisor LLC